copyright License vs Traditional Finance License: What’s the Difference and Why It Matters

copyright License vs Traditional Finance License: What’s the Difference and Why It Matters

Blog Article

As copyright adoption accelerates across the globe, many entrepreneurs are stepping into the copyright space with bold ambitions. But one of the most misunderstood areas of launching a copyright business is licensing—especially when comparing a copyright license to traditional financial licenses.

Are they the same? Can a bank license cover copyright activities? Do you need both?

This article will help you understand the core differences between a copyright license and a traditional finance license, and why choosing the right one could make or break your copyright venture.

What Is a copyright License?

A copyright license is a specialized license issued by a government or regulatory body that allows businesses to legally engage in copyright-related services. These services can include:

• copyright exchanges

• Custodial wallets

• Token issuance (ICOs, STOs, NFTs)

• copyright payment processing

• copyright asset advisory services

• Stablecoin issuance

• DeFi platform management

In Europe, for example, the MiCA regulation has introduced unified rules for obtaining a copyright license valid across all EU countries. Other regions such as Dubai, Singapore, and Switzerland have developed their own licensing frameworks for virtual asset service providers (VASPs).

What Is a Traditional Finance License?

Traditional finance licenses are issued to companies that offer conventional financial services such as:

• Commercial banking

• Payment institutions

• Investment firms

• Forex trading platforms

• Insurance companies

• Lending and credit institutions

Examples of traditional finance regulators include:

• FCA in the UK

• BaFin in Germany

• SEC in the United States

• FINMA in Switzerland

• Central Bank of Lithuania for payment institutions

These licenses are typically harder to obtain and come with strict capital requirements, fit-and-proper tests, and heavy compliance.

Key Differences Between copyright License and Finance License

Let’s break it down across key aspects:

Can You Use a Traditional Finance License for copyright?

Generally, no—a traditional financial license does not authorize copyright-specific services unless explicitly stated. For example:

• A payment institution license doesn’t automatically allow copyright-fiat transactions.

• A brokerage license doesn’t permit you to offer copyright assets unless they are considered financial instruments in that jurisdiction.

• A banking license may allow custody of digital assets only if the national authority has issued guidelines for it.

So, if your business is focused on copyright—even partially—you should apply for a copyright license that is designed for digital assets.

Why Choose a copyright License Over a Traditional License?

✅ Lower Barriers to Entry

Most jurisdictions that offer copyright licenses are startup-friendly. The capital requirements, staffing obligations, and documentation are simpler compared to opening a regulated bank or investment firm.

✅ Faster Time to Market

You can obtain a copyright license in as little as 30–60 days in copyright-friendly countries like Lithuania or Estonia.

✅ Specialized Legal Framework

Traditional finance regulators often treat copyright as a “grey zone.” A dedicated copyright license ensures you're fully compliant under a framework that was made for digital assets.

✅ Future-Proofing Your Business

As global regulators introduce clearer rules (such as MiCA in the EU), licensed copyright firms will be best positioned to operate legally and scale across borders.

When Would You Need Both Licenses?

There are some business models where holding both a copyright and traditional finance license makes sense. These include:

• Hybrid payment companies that process both fiat and copyright payments.

• Neobanks that integrate copyright savings or investment options.

• Asset managers offering portfolios of traditional stocks and copyright tokens.

• Institutional copyright exchanges that handle large fiat-to-copyright flows.

In such cases, you might need a copyright license to handle digital assets and a payment institution license or investment license to deal with fiat or regulated securities.

Case Study: Lithuania as a Dual-License Destination

Lithuania is one of the most progressive countries for copyright and fintech businesses. It offers:

• copyright license through the FCIS for virtual asset services

• Electronic Money Institution (EMI) license via the Central Bank for fiat services

This allows companies to:

• Offer both copyright and fiat wallets

• Enable card payments and IBAN accounts

• Launch regulated exchanges with copyright-fiat gateways

• Operate under full compliance within the EU

By combining both licenses, businesses gain a competitive edge and broader service offerings.

Choosing the Right License for Your Business

Here are a few guiding questions to help you decide:

1. Are you dealing only with copyright assets?
   → Start with a copyright license.

2. Are you handling fiat money or issuing debit cards?
   → Consider a payment license or EMI license.

3. Do you advise clients on investments or manage assets?
   → You may need an investment firm license plus a copyright license.

4. Are you offering tokenized versions of securities?
   → You might fall under securities law and need dual licensing.

Final Thoughts

A copyright license is your gateway to building a compliant and trusted digital asset business. While traditional financial licenses are still essential in many sectors, they are not tailored for the fast-moving world of copyright.

Before jumping in, work with professionals who understand both sides of the regulatory fence—copyright and finance.

---

Looking to apply for a copyright license in the EU or globally?
Partner with adamsmith.lt for expert guidance, fast incorporation, and full regulatory support in Lithuania, Estonia, Dubai, and beyond.

Report this page